From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Samsung SoCs: OneNAND support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Kyungmin Park In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240909170302q47b306edn2d73b03243757ce1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090917081659.GA28591@july> <4AB1F3C5.7000309@gmail.com> <9c9fda240909170245u2b21b898v11c3316726746464@mail.gmail.com> <9c9fda240909170302q47b306edn2d73b03243757ce1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:06:00 +0300 Message-Id: <1253181960.3778.17.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 19:02 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> Very quick comment. Could you please avoid this style of putting function > >> name to the printk? We have lots of this in onenand_base.c, and they are > >> often wrong, because function names change. > >> > >> Could we please use dev_printk(), dev_dbg() and the like instead? You'll > > FYI: In case of MTD, > dev_printk(), dev_dbg() not working. I used &mtd->dev, > > Do you know how to set the dev instead of &mtd->dev? No, but you could investigate this. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)