From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [CHIPS] stm_flash: new ST PSD4256G compatible flash chip driver From: David Woodhouse To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0909221630n62b72c86we8c01ec062acdade@mail.gmail.com> References: <1244890798-10908-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1253390936.6317.33.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <8bd0f97a0909191328j6be58c20o9bf4a4c3aadb1634@mail.gmail.com> <1253394106.6317.38.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <8bd0f97a0909221605j1f4a0d62m5707e0ad11c7ece4@mail.gmail.com> <1253661650.27055.494.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <8bd0f97a0909221630n62b72c86we8c01ec062acdade@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:39:51 -0700 Message-Id: <1253662791.27055.522.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:30 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > nah, none of the first 0x10 bytes are 0xff: > 00000000 7f 1d bb 58 8f 04 4c 6d f5 ee 55 d6 79 b4 31 51 > |...X..Lm..U.y.1Q| > > this is the only board ive seen that has this part, but i can do a > sampling of different revisions to make sure they're all 0xff. if > you're ok with the small changes i mentioned, then i'll post a patch > for that (to replace the original proposed chip driver) and call it a > day. Sounds good. If you can get it to me in the next half hour or so, I'll sneak it into my 2.6.32 pull request. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation