From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OneNAND] Standardising prints in onenand_base.c
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1254726268.3359.3.camel@localhost>
References: <C45F9E809A3C4FB0A470336A43DCCB74@sisodomain.com>
	<1254726268.3359.3.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:11:29 +0100
Message-Id: <1254726689.8859.5.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Amul Kumar Saha <amul.saha@samsung.com>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>, adrian.hunter@nokia.com
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 10:04 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> 
> David decided to ignore the discussion and pushed your first patch
> instead of this one already.

Did I? Most of the discussion was about the patch not actually
_applying_. The latest one from Friday did actually apply, and seemed
sane enough. What did I miss?

-- 
dwmw2