From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MwwBx-0003vs-Ij for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:02:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3]: mtdoops fixes and improvements From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Simon Kagstrom In-Reply-To: <20091008172516.64b5c462@marrow.netinsight.se> References: <20091002160510.191ef5a4@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091008172516.64b5c462@marrow.netinsight.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:02:15 +0300 Message-Id: <1255258935.16942.29.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd , Aaro Koskinen Reply-To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 17:25 +0200, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > Hi! > > Here are a couple of patches to mtdoops which I've been working on for > a while. They should be applied on top of Aaros fix for panic_on_oops. > That one technically breaks building mtdoops as a module, so I sent a > patch to LKML which exports panic_on_oops: > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/52505/ > > The patches here are: I've just pushed a small clean up patch for mtdoops to my l2 tree, could you send patches on top of that, so that we would not conflict, please? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)