From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] panic.c: export panic_on_oops From: David Woodhouse To: Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20091012142634.GB4565@elte.hu> References: <20091012111545.GB8857@elte.hu> <1255346731.9659.31.camel@localhost> <20091012113758.GB11035@elte.hu> <20091012140149.6789efab@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091012120951.GA16799@elte.hu> <20091012142714.56362465@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091012123210.GB22766@elte.hu> <20091012140821.5dfa1598@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20091012132503.GD25464@elte.hu> <1255354342.30919.17.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20091012142634.GB4565@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:36:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1255358181.9111.14.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , LKML , "Koskinen Aaro \(Nokia-D/Helsinki\)" , linux-mtd , Simon Kagstrom , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Not if the failure is say a s2ram hang that requires a power cycle. Also > there are certain classes of bugs that only occur on cold boot. Plus > there's the "need to unplug the battery to revive the system" class of > bugs (but they are rare). So you need to build in enough ECC to cope with the decay which happens when RAM isn't being refreshed for a few seconds... :) > So i think the MTD / flash stuff is powerful. Yeah, definitely. I was just pointing out that we can actually do a lot better on today's commodity hardware too. -- dwmw2