From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (misc drivers)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:05:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256544329.29885.398.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026075617.GA793@isilmar.linta.de>
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:56 +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:26:31AM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > No, I don't have all that much PCMCIA hardware -- and specifically none for
> > > the drivers which were modified in this patch (parport, ixj-telephony,
> > > sl811; pcmcia_mtd is marked broken anyway).
> >
> > This driver is old and ugly, and it is even possible that no one uses it
> > anymore, so I guess getting clean-ups without testing is ok for it.
>
> Which one are you referring to specifically?
Actually I referred to pcmciamtd. I was confused a little, sorry.
> > However, in that case the clean-up patches should be reviewable, which I
> > wouldn't say about your patch :-)
>
> It are "only" 46 line changes max per driver?
>
> > Could you please split it on several smaller patches, each doing one
> > thing only?
>
> Well, I could split up the -- related -- CS_CHECK() and dev_dbg() parts if
> _really_ necessary.
I cannot comment about "_really_", this is just what I personally think
would be a good idea, up to you.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-26 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091024194219.GA19546@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
2009-10-24 19:43 ` [PATCH 14/16] pcmcia: use dynamic debug infrastructure, deprecate CS_CHECK (misc drivers) Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26 6:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-10-26 7:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26 7:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-10-26 7:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-26 8:05 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2009-10-26 10:19 ` Alan Cox
2009-10-26 10:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-03 8:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-11-07 11:19 ` pcmciamtd -- what's broken, who needs it? Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 11:29 ` Komuro
2009-11-07 11:33 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 16:57 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-11-08 8:12 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-11-07 22:33 ` Komuro
2009-11-04 10:20 ` PETEC 2MB SRAM Pep Talens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256544329.29885.398.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox