From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NDYQI-0001zz-4s for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:05:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] JFFS2: min/max confusion? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Roel Kluin In-Reply-To: <4B08088C.8050305@gmail.com> References: <4B08088C.8050305@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:05:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1259219125.29118.41.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , LKML Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 16:34 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote: > MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > --- > fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > unless I am mistaken? > > diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c > index 6caf1e1..800171d 100644 > --- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c > +++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ > > int jffs2_sum_init(struct jffs2_sb_info *c) > { > - uint32_t sum_size = max_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE); > + uint32_t sum_size = min_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE); > > c->summary = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL); This looks right, I've pushed your patch to my l2-mtd tree, thanks. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)