From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NTl7M-0004lU-10 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:53:20 +0000 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so22934363fxm.2 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:53:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: ubiattach fails with "bad image sequence number" From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Jeff Angielski In-Reply-To: <1263081089.7315.119.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4B2FF7CF.7040401@theptrgroup.com> <1263081089.7315.119.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:53:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1263081191.7315.121.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 01:51 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:33 -0500, Jeff Angielski wrote: > > If I ubiformat my NAND partition with an UBIFS image I keep on getting > > "bad image sequence number" when I try to do the ubiattach. If I just > > do a plain ubiformat with no image then everything works fine when I > > ubiattach. > > > > I was wondering if somebody ran into something similar. The steps are > > so trivial it seems like something fundamentally wrong with either the > > mkfs.ubifs or the ubiformat. > > > > I did not see anything related to this on the UBFI FAQ or documentation. > > I believe this is an ubiformat bug. Thanks for reporting and sorry for > inconvenience. > > I attach and inline 2 patches which should fix this. I cannot have a > possibility to test them now, so they are untested. They are against the > latest mtd-utils.git (commit a4e502d99129da8ebba6d40b373a4422a175e9af). Could you please try them and report if they fix your problem or not? P.S. when we fix this, we'll have to tag a new mtd-utils version, since this is a very bad bug. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)