From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.220.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NUDSf-0007No-9H for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:09:13 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so11547026fxm.4 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:09:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Question on partition wise ECC support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Nishanth Menon In-Reply-To: <782515bb1001060642v78e1c482we6612d8cb8ac041c@mail.gmail.com> References: <782515bb1001060642v78e1c482we6612d8cb8ac041c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:09:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1263190144.30988.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Vimal Singh , Linux MTD Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 08:42 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Hi, > Just a generic question: for NAND devices, each ECC strategy such as > 256byte/512byte ecc has tradeoff b/w reliability Vs performance. I > wonder if we have some mechanism if we can maintain different ECC > strategy per partition. I do not think it is possible. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)