public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Marek Skuczynski <mareksk7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Memory leak on UBI volume truncating
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:43:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263724992.8276.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263724633.8276.135.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 12:37 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 15:28 +0100, Marek Skuczynski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >   I have prepare a simple volume update stress test (see test code below).
> >   This test has been run for kernel 2.6.23 with some updates from 2.6.28,
> >   and always after a few minutes the OOM killer was launched.
> > 
> >   What i found it that each an UBI volume truncate operation with
> > ubiupdatevol tool
> >   causes memory leak. I think this happens because:
> > 
> >   - ubi_start_update()  param "bytes" is equal 0
> > 
> >   - vol->updating flag is re-set to 0
> > 
> >   - vol->upd_buf is allocated regardless of vol->updating flag,
> >      but not released on device close by vol_cdev_release()
> > 
> >   I never run the test on a newer kernel version, so I cannot confirm
> > that this problem still exists.
> > 
> >   Please confirm, whether my findings are correct or not, thanks.
> 
> thanks for this finding. Looks like your analysis is right. Does this
> simple patch help?

Actually this even simpler patch should fix the issue. Could you please
test it and let me know if it helps.

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
index c1d7b88..425bf5a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ int ubi_start_update(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol,
                if (err)
                        return err;
                vol->updating = 0;
+               return 0;
        }

        vol->upd_buf = vmalloc(ubi->leb_size);

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-17 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-13 14:28 Memory leak on UBI volume truncating Marek Skuczynski
2010-01-17 10:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-17 10:43   ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
     [not found]     ` <a328840c1001180034n7fd1c3e9m420afef60f7c97ab@mail.gmail.com>
2010-01-18  8:36       ` Marek Skuczynski
2010-01-18 10:03         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-28 15:07         ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263724992.8276.140.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mareksk7@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox