public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Marek Skuczynski <mareksk7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Emulated write failures cause block marking as bad
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:33:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265304794.7343.135.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a328840c1002040902ic5c17a8p5262e482b4fced01@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:02 +0100, Marek Skuczynski wrote:
> Hello,
>    Today, I was trying to use debug option MTD_UBI_DEBUG_EMULATE_WRITE_FAILURES.
>    What I have found is that occasionally,  the emulated write error
> happens while
>    executing sync_erase() function. In result of this, the part that
> is calling sync_erase()
>    mark the block as bad (see log below).
>    After a few minutes I had many bad blocks.

This is true.

>  Using this option to
> volume update test
>    makes no sense.

This is too strong statement. It does make sens - you verify that the
error handling functionality works.

You can say that this option is not good enough for you, this will be
more fair statement.

>    I am using kernel 2.6.23 with updated UBI  from 2.6.29.
>    Have you experienced this problem already ? if so, is this has been fixed ?

Yes, I saw it. This is purely a debugging feature, and it was enough for
me.

You can easilly develop it a bit more, and make it stop returning erase
errors when the amount of bad eraseblocks has reached some level.

Just amend ubi_dbg_is_erase_failure()

You might want to do the same for 'ubi_dbg_is_write_failure()', for the
same reasons, basically.

HTH.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-04 17:02 Emulated write failures cause block marking as bad Marek Skuczynski
2010-02-04 17:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-02-04 19:38   ` Marek Skuczynski
2010-02-05  9:23     ` Marek Skuczynski
2010-02-15 14:10       ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1265304794.7343.135.camel@localhost \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mareksk7@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox