From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Nfv8t-0002y9-Tk for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:01:12 +0000 Subject: Re: Why erase_pending_blocks in write_super? (was: [PATCH] JFFS2: Erase max 3 EB's in ...) From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Joakim Tjernlund In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:59:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1265979582.29027.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Kai-Uwe Bloem Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 13:30 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > So, can you please enlighten me? What's the advantage of having the pending > > list erased in write_super? Can I possibly remove it without experiencing > > other problems? > > Me too wants to know :) I believe there is no reason. This is why I suggested to move it to the BGT. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)