From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OAGaO-0000JN-Uz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 May 2010 05:58:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] UBI: improve empty flash handling From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior In-Reply-To: <20100506095218.GB15335@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <1272881582-17196-1-git-send-email-Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> <20100506095218.GB15335@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 08:57:53 +0300 Message-ID: <1273211873.2178.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:52 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Artem Bityutskiy | 2010-05-03 13:12:58 [+0300]: > > >Hi Sebastian, > Hi Artem, > > >Please, review and test the following series. > > The code looks fine. I wiped the flash and the test resulted in: Pushed the patches to the master branch so far. If everything is allright, I'll push them to linux-next in few days. This is because I can amend patches which are in the master branch (i.e., rebase the git tree), but when they go to linux-next, I try hard to avoid any re-basing. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)