From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Erase race?
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 06:32:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273635175.8881.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinWOfcRRrfhgUO2tvBeVDu_PvnKeKa_0MQKbJtG@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 22:30 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 16:24 -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I have a few machines that have UBI and UBIFS on NOR flash that are
> >> > undergoing continuous reboot testing.
> >> > One of them just caught the following failure:
> >> >
> >> > [ 51.250000] IXP4XX-Flash.0: buffer write error (status 0xd0)
> >> > [ 51.250000] UBI error: ubi_io_write: error -22 while writing 64
> >> > bytes to PEB 226:0, written 0 bytes
> >> > [ 51.270000] UBI error: erase_worker: failed to erase PEB 226, error -22
> >> > [ 51.270000] UBI warning: ubi_ro_mode: switch to read-only mode
> >> > [ 51.290000] UBI error: do_work: work failed with error code -22
> >> > [ 51.290000] UBI error: ubi_thread: ubi_bgt0d: work failed with error code -22
> >> >
> >> > Looking at this it appears that the failure might have been caused due
> >> > to the erase_worker and ubi_io_write occurring out of order... since
> >> > it looks like ubi_io_write was trying to write at offset 0 of the PEB,
> >> > which I imagine would have to be the EC header, which should happen
> >> > after the block is erased. But it doesn't seem to be the case here.
> >>
> >> I had this issue occur again on another system:
> >> [ 48.250000] IXP4XX-Flash.0: buffer write error (status 0xd0)
> >> [ 48.250000] UBI error: ubi_io_write: error -22 while writing 64
> >> bytes to PEB 111:0, written 0 bytes
> >> [ 48.280000] UBI error: erase_worker: failed to erase PEB 111, error -22
> >> [ 48.280000] UBI warning: ubi_ro_mode: switch to read-only mode
> >> [ 48.310000] UBI error: do_work: work failed with error code -22
> >> [ 48.310000] UBI error: ubi_thread: ubi_bgt0d: work failed with error code -22
> >>
> >> Can anyone comment as to my theory that this is a race condition
> >> between ubi_io_write and erase_worker occurring out of order?
> >
> > Did you debug this further? Any new findings?
>
> I finally got a capture of this with CONFIG_MTD_UBI_DEBUG turned on:
>
> [ 61.710000] IXP4XX-Flash.0: buffer write error (status 0xd0)
> [ 61.710000] UBI error: ubi_io_write: error -22 while writing 64
> bytes to PEB 136:0, written 0 bytes
> [ 61.740000] [<c011a240>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x170) from
> [<bf0157a8>] (ubi_io_write+0x1ec/0x214 [ubi])
> [ 61.770000] [<bf0157a8>] (ubi_io_write+0x1ec/0x214 [ubi]) from
> [<bf01599c>] (ubi_io_write_vid_hdr+0x1cc/0x20c [ubi])
> [ 61.800000] [<bf01599c>] (ubi_io_write_vid_hdr+0x1cc/0x20c [ubi])
> from [<bf016c50>] (sync_erase+0xd4/0x128 [ubi])
> [ 61.830000] [<bf016c50>] (sync_erase+0xd4/0x128 [ubi]) from
> [<bf017344>] (erase_worker+0x28/0x2d8 [ubi])
> [ 61.860000] [<bf017344>] (erase_worker+0x28/0x2d8 [ubi]) from
> [<bf0180e4>] (do_work+0x98/0x13c [ubi])
> [ 61.860000] [<bf0180e4>] (do_work+0x98/0x13c [ubi]) from
> [<bf01824c>] (ubi_thread+0xc4/0x158 [ubi])
> [ 61.890000] [<bf01824c>] (ubi_thread+0xc4/0x158 [ubi]) from
> [<c0142b84>] (kthread+0x7c/0x84)
> [ 61.890000] [<c0142b84>] (kthread+0x7c/0x84) from [<c0115378>]
> (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
> [ 61.920000] UBI error: erase_worker: failed to erase PEB 136, error -22
> [ 61.920000] UBI warning: ubi_ro_mode: switch to read-only mode
> [ 61.950000] UBI error: do_work: work failed with error code -22
> [ 61.950000] UBI error: ubi_thread: ubi_bgt0d: work failed with error code -22
So it is probably not a kind of race you assumed before. Your flash for
some reasons encounters an error, dunno why.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-12 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-13 20:15 Erase race? Jon Ringle
2010-04-20 20:24 ` Jon Ringle
2010-04-20 22:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-27 12:59 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-12 2:30 ` Jon Ringle
2010-05-12 3:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-05-12 8:21 ` massimo cirillo
2010-05-12 12:00 ` Jon Ringle
2010-05-12 12:31 ` massimo cirillo
2010-05-13 13:23 ` Jon Ringle
2010-04-20 23:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273635175.8881.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=jon@ringle.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).