From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/chips: add SST39WF160x NOR-flashes From: David Woodhouse To: Wolfram Sang In-Reply-To: <20100514012023.GA30794@pengutronix.de> References: <1272334774-17019-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1273797888.9999.591.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20100514012023.GA30794@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 02:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1273800521.9999.726.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Guillaume LECERF , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 03:20 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > My flashes don't have P_ID_SST_OLD, sadly, but P_ID_AMD_STD. Still, unlike > other AMD_STD-flashes, my flashes need their custom unlock address. I couldn't > find a way to distinguish this from the standard case with the regular unlock > addresses. Makes sense; thanks for the clarification. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation