From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: How stable is jffs2 summarize option?
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Thorsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FChlfelder?= <muehlfelder@enertex.de>
In-Reply-To: <201006011126.23862.muehlfelder@enertex.de>
References: <201005311503.42629.muehlfelder@enertex.de>
	<1275383715.25797.14.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	<201006011126.23862.muehlfelder@enertex.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:33:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1275384788.25797.17.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:26 +0200, Thorsten Mühlfelder wrote:
> and what do you think about switching to yaffs2? I know it is developed 
> elsewhere, but it seems to be a good alternative to jffs2+summary and 
> probably switching is easier than to ubifs. 

Why would you think that switching to something that isn't part of the
Linux kernel would be easier than switching to ubifs? That seems... odd.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation