From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OOVj8-0006LR-Tk for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:58:51 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so771464iwn.36 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: UBIFS mount failure on NOR flash From: Philby John To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:29:39 +0530 Message-Id: <1276606779.20001.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: pjohn@mvista.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, Platform: Cavium CN5020 Filesystem: UBIFS Flash Type: NOR Flash Size: 8MB Partition Details Kernel Log: Creating 2 MTD partitions on "phys_mapped_flash": 0x000000000000-0x000000700000 : "Octeon BOOT partition" 0x000000700000-0x000000800000 : "Octeon test partition" $mount -t ubifs ubi1:test /mnt/nor UBIFS error (pid 851): init_constants_early: too few LEBs (12), min. is 17 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on ubi1:test, missing codepage or helper program, or other error (for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might need a /sbin/mount. helper program) In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so But JFFS2 is able to mount the same partition flawlessly. Shouldn't UBIFS be able to do the same? What I would like to know is, is this the expected behavior or a bug? If its a bug I would like to look into it. Thanks and regards, Philby