* Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock
@ 2010-06-23 19:26 David Wuertele
2010-07-08 9:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Wuertele @ 2010-06-23 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Reading http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/jffs2.html, it says that jffs2
can be mounted with or without the mtdblock driver. Eg:
mount -t jffs2 mtd2 /foo
vs
mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock2 /foo
I'm wondering what is the difference between these two methods with respect to
performance?
Thanks,
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock
2010-06-23 19:26 Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock David Wuertele
@ 2010-07-08 9:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2010-07-08 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Wuertele; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:26 +0000, David Wuertele wrote:
> Reading http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/jffs2.html, it says that jffs2
> can be mounted with or without the mtdblock driver. Eg:
>
> mount -t jffs2 mtd2 /foo
> vs
> mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock2 /foo
>
> I'm wondering what is the difference between these two methods with respect to
> performance?
There is no difference.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-08 9:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-23 19:26 Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock David Wuertele
2010-07-08 9:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).