From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OaPcv-0003cl-3p for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:53:37 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so1950798fxm.36 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: UBIFS memleak ? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Matthieu CASTET In-Reply-To: <4C3C3024.8050104@parrot.com> References: <4C3C3024.8050104@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:53:31 +0300 Message-Id: <1279443211.16247.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 11:21 +0200, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > Hi, > > in mount_ubifs shouldn't we do something like that in case of > ubifs_leb_unmap error ? Yes, are you going to send a proper patch with signed-off-by? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)