From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OaWtF-0005v7-L5 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:38:58 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so2062257fxm.36 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improved BB Scanning From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Brian Norris In-Reply-To: <1279059181-29300-1-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> References: <1279059181-29300-1-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:38:52 +0300 Message-Id: <1279471132.16247.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Maxim Levitsky Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:12 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > This is a two-patch correction and update to my previous attempt > to address a few issues with bad block scanning. Overall, they should > help renovate some incorrect and unwieldy code. > > I included the top few maintainers from get_maintainers.pl. Sorry if these > were incorrect addressees. > > Brian Norris (2): > mtd/nand, BB detect: factory marker in page 1, 2, last and byte 1 or 6 > mtd/nand: More BB Detection, dynamic scan options > > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > include/linux/mtd/bbm.h | 4 ++ > 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) I did not _really_ review this, it the patches look good. How did you test them? Did you test on both large and small page NANDs? I pushed your patches to my l2-mtd-2.6.git / master -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)