From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: stefani@seibold.net
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:30:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280986221.1175.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280984291.1175.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 07:58 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 21:40 +0200, stefani@seibold.net wrote:
> > From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> >
> > This patch prevent to schedule while atomic by changing the
> > flchip_shared spinlock into a mutex. This should be save since no atomic
> > path will use this lock.
> >
> > This patch is based on linux kernel 2.6.35. Please apply.
> >
> > It was requested by Arnd Bergmann and Vasiliy Kulikov.
>
> Taken to my l2-mtd-2.6.git / master
This patch causes the following compilation error:
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c: In function ‘lpddr_cmdset’:
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:101: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spinlock_check’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:271: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:101: error: ‘struct mutex’ has no member named ‘rlock’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c: In function ‘get_chip’:
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:220: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_lock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:282: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:233: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:248: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_lock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:282: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:264: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:278: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c: In function ‘put_chip’:
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:351: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_lock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:282: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:359: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:377: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c:381: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type
include/linux/spinlock.h:322: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mutex *’
Removed from my tree.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 19:40 [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex stefani
2010-08-03 8:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-05 4:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-05 5:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-05 7:19 stefani
2010-08-05 9:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280986221.1175.20.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).