From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: Increase NAND_MAX_OOBSIZE From: David Woodhouse To: Brian Norris In-Reply-To: <4C6EF36F.2080306@broadcom.com> References: <1282332973-12077-1-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> <1282332973-12077-2-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> <1282333385.25239.88.camel@localhost> <4C6EF36F.2080306@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:38:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1282340322.25239.137.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Cernekee , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 14:28 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > For the MAX macros? I have no idea. There were comments there telling > me to do this whenever newer chips are supported. I was thinking of the nand_ecc_layout stuff, I think. Perhaps these buffers should be dynamically allocated and we should ditch the MAX macros altogether? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation