From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: "Matthew L. Creech" <mlcreech@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ubi_eba_init_scan: cannot reserve enough PEBs
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:51:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282708264.16502.106.camel@brekeke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=AXo7Ziiz9qWTFMuYaMJbq0xpS2YcuJeWL3BC5@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:38 -0400, Matthew L. Creech wrote:
> I applied your patch to 2.6.35 and booted that on the same bad device
> for which I posted a boot log. But to my surprise, it didn't give any
> errors at all - the boot process completed normally, and it appears to
> be working fine so far. I had booted the kernel from memory, so I
> pulled the power and let it go through the normal boot process (using
> the 2.6.31 kernel that's built in to the firmware) - that also works
> fine.
>
> I checked my sanity by trying another bad device, and the same thing
> happened there - booting 2.6.35 somehow "fixed" my problem.
> Unfortunately, this means I can no longer tell what happened to the
> original block you were interested in. I'll try to dig up another bad
> device, and use your patch with an older kenel version to see what
> happens there.
This is interesting. BTW, if you use 2.6.31, you should in any case
apply patches from the ubifs-v2.6.31 back-port tree, there were some
good fixes.
> Is it at all possible that the error was caused by something at the
> UBI or MTD layer which was fixed between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35, and
> booting up with 2.6.35 "touched" something that made it work again
> even after reverting to an older kernel? Sounds pretty far-fetched,
> but I don't know how else to explain these suddenly-recovered
> devices...
OK :-)
Artem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 18:37 ubi_eba_init_scan: cannot reserve enough PEBs Matthew L. Creech
2010-07-26 5:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-26 21:13 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-07-27 15:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-27 15:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-28 5:46 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-08-22 15:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-31 12:09 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-09-01 15:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-02 6:47 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-09-02 9:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-22 15:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-27 20:47 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-07-30 16:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-30 17:51 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-08-02 4:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-22 18:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-24 22:38 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-08-25 3:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-08-31 15:36 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-09-01 18:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-06 9:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-07 15:59 ` Matthew L. Creech
2010-09-07 17:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-07 17:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282708264.16502.106.camel@brekeke \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlcreech@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).