From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OtFsj-0001Qg-Ab for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:19:50 +0000 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so6508414bwz.36 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: NOTE! mkfs.ubifs From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Adrian Hunter In-Reply-To: <4C8612B9.4060305@nokia.com> References: <1283848562-19564-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1283850698.2979.25.camel@localhost> <4C8612B9.4060305@nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:18:19 +0300 Message-ID: <1283933899.2979.56.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Arno Steffen Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:23 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > I do not agree with changing the behaviour. It should be a new option, > and you could add a warning explaining what the root inode permissions > are and why e.g. > > Warning: Option ?? not used. Setting root inode permissions to blah > > Warning: Option ?? used. Setting root inode permissions to blah Sent you v2 of this patch with an alternative (less harsh) solution. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)