From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OtOnx-0005wA-Sr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:51:31 +0000 Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so432136bwz.36 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Partition size limit of UBIFS? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Xing Qianqian In-Reply-To: <000001cb4f6c$d2f90af0$78eb20d0$@com> References: <000001cb4f6c$d2f90af0$78eb20d0$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:51:23 +0300 Message-ID: <1283968283.7370.5.camel@brekeke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 23:45 +0800, Xing Qianqian wrote: > Hi, All > > As we know, MTD has partition size limit of 2G. I think it is much larger now, after we converted offsets and sizes to 64-bit variables. > Do you know the size limit > of UBIFS partition and file size? I'm too lazy to look at ubifs-media.h, but all sizes are 64-bit variables there. But I never tested UBIFS on really large UBI volumes. Never believe theoretical limits - test. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)