From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OwWHF-0003Vy-1m for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:26:37 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so3401057bwz.36 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] nanddump: Rename --nobad to --noskipbad From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Wolfram Sang In-Reply-To: <20100917075411.GA3119@pengutronix.de> References: <1284359070.27765.155.camel@localhost> <1284362113-26737-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1284704420.2373.60.camel@localhost> <20100917075411.GA3119@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:24:39 +0300 Message-ID: <1284711879.2373.61.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Mike Frysinger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 09:54 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:20:20AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:15 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > "nobad" might lead to the assumption that bad blocks are skipped, but this > > > option does exactly the opposite. Use a more descriptive name. > > > > > > Reported-by: Jon Povey > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > Cc: Mike Frysinger > > > > It does not apply to the latest mtd-utils tree. Would you please re-send > > an updated version? > > Ehrm, it still applies on top of Mike's original patch (it just seems > that the latter is not pushed yet despite your mail saying so). Or do > you want me to fold those two? Indeed forgot to push it out, sorry. No, I'll sort this out, thanks. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)