From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Oz52p-0000zY-Uc for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:58:20 +0000 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2062335fxm.36 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 02:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: mks.jffs2 uid/gid for root inode From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Arno Steffen In-Reply-To: References: <1283846532.2979.0.camel@localhost> <1284019747.2979.73.camel@localhost> <1284030609.27765.4.camel@localhost> <1284033943.27765.22.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:56:37 +0300 Message-ID: <1285322197.29268.167.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David.Woodhouse@intel.com Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 11:52 +0200, Arno Steffen wrote: > 2010/9/9 Artem Bityutskiy : > > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:54 +0200, Arno Steffen wrote: > >> Thanks for the patch. But this is for ubifs, while I detected this bug > >> in jffs2 - this is what I am using. > > > > Oh my god, I really need to start wearing glasses. Sorry. But the same > > bug exists in mkfs.ubifs, anyway. Since I'm not interested in JFFS2 > > anymore, I'm not going to fix it. You can do analogous thing for > > mkfs.jffs2, if you wish. > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) > > If it's mkfs.jffs2 is not your fokus, Artem, maybe David can have a look at it. > It make sense to keep the same functionality for all mkfs tools. May be, unsurprisingly, I have no jurisdiction over him, he is free to do or not to do something for you. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)