From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P07ev-0000sU-Qf for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:58:00 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so4321108bwz.36 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd-utils: unify flash_erase and flash_eraseall From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <1285570258-17068-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1285394847-29844-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1285570258-17068-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:56:06 +0300 Message-ID: <1285570566.16181.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 02:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > These have overlapping functionality, and while flash_eraseall supports > newer 64bit ioctls, flash_erase does not. So rather than graft support > onto flash_erase, merge the functionality of two into flash_erase so we > only have to support one util from now on. > > A simple wrapper is provided to ease old flash_eraseall users into the > new combined flash_erase util. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- > v3 > - rebase after recent common.h changes Pushed, thanks. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)