From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P0Wn3-00086x-1b for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:48:01 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so5507311bwz.36 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd-utils: unify flash_erase and flash_eraseall From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <1285293221-25028-4-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1285293221-25028-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1285293221-25028-4-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:46:07 +0300 Message-ID: <1285667167.2437.66.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 21:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > These have overlapping functionality, and while flash_eraseall supports > newer 64bit ioctls, flash_erase does not. So rather than graft support > onto flash_erase, merge the functionality of two into flash_erase so we > only have to support one util from now on. > > A simple wrapper is provided to ease old flash_eraseall users into the > new combined flash_erase util. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger And BTW, thanks for good clean-ups! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)