From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PIzre-0005BG-3E for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:29:06 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2576415bwz.36 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:29:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Are there UBI layout changes between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Charles Manning In-Reply-To: <1290068529.2270.5.camel@localhost> References: <201011181244.04745.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> <1290068529.2270.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1290068923.2270.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:22 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:44 +1300, Charles Manning wrote: > > Folk > > > > I have been helping some people get an omap3 overo-based system going. > > Everything is working fine using 2.6.35 and software ECC, but when I changed > > I change to 2.6.36 and hwecc things stop working. I get the following > > problem, and obviously no boot :-(. > > Hmm, should not be, at least not intentional. Could you please try to > bisect - there are not so many UBI changes so you can probably find the > offending one. And in fact, you can even revert all UBI changes which happened after 2.6.35 and try it. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)