From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1POYHq-0005t4-Rg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:15:07 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so8811707bwz.36 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:15:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bud_replay size question From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Steve Iribarne In-Reply-To: <1291392477.2365.64.camel@localhost> References: <4CF691F0.9010607@grid-net.com> <1291392477.2365.64.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:14:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1291392874.2365.67.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:07 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Alternatively, you can try to look at all UBIFS allocations. I will not > be surprized if it allocates some buffers which are not really neaded in > R/O mode, although we did do some work to allocate less resources when > we are in R/O mode. You can experiment in Linux, because it is easier, > and if you find unneeded buffers, fix this, and then port your changes > to u-boot. And you can try to look at UBI - in R/O mode we probably need less than we allocate, but again dunno for sure, should be checke. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)