From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PSnbP-0000vl-6e for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:24:51 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so1913591bwz.30 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:24:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: About NAND Simulator question From: Artem Bityutskiy To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E8=98=87=E5=81=89=E6=88=A9?= In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:24:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1292405061.2512.26.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, please, send all e-mails concerning nandsim to linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, you can also CC me, I prefer using "Artem Bityutskiy " On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 17:57 +0800, 蘇偉戩 wrote: > When i read your code,I can understand the Simulator has file-base and > RAM-backed emulation Yes. > But I have question is weather the file-base emulation can simulate > the flash memory's performance. No, I do not think so. Originally I added some things like delays emulation, but then never used that, and I do not think that is correct. I think we better remove that functionality to confuse people less. Or someone should actually fix that. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)