From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f48.google.com ([209.85.161.48]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PSryW-00009d-Cz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:05:03 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2065144fxm.21 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:04:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mtd: OneNAND: OMAP2/3: add support for command line partitioning From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Adrian Hunter In-Reply-To: <20101213122051.20685.46383.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> References: <20101213122042.20685.52929.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> <20101213122051.20685.46383.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:04:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1292421869.2512.56.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-mtd Mailing List , Kyungmin Park , David Woodhouse Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:20 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > From d27a88c5f9f18a7c38784c085889c3e1053340cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Adrian Hunter > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:40:16 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/7] mtd: OneNAND: OMAP2/3: add support for command line partitioning > > Add the ability to parse MTD partition information from the > kernel command line. > > Note that a pointless BUG_ON is removed, as are redundant > calls to 'del_mtd_partitions()' and 'del_mtd_device()' > because they are also done by 'onenand_release()'. > > Finally note that 'add_mtd_device()' returns 1 on failure > so the error condition was incorrect. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter I've pushed patches 1 and 7 to l2-mtd-2.6, but patch #2 is not applicable. I think this is because of changes Kyungmin made recently. Could you please re-send patches 2 and 3 on top of the l2 tree? I guess I can apply 2 and 3 now. Patch 4 should wait for comments from Tony, AFAICS. Patches 5 and 6 are dependent, and hence should wait as well, AFAICS. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)