From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17Kxql-0007cL-00 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:03:31 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3D115F9B.9030203@ctam.com.au> References: <3D115F9B.9030203@ctam.com.au> To: brendan.simon@ctam.com.au Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: doc2000 nftl[abcd] devices Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:03:20 +0100 Message-ID: <12942.1024563800@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: brendan.simon@ctam.com.au said: > Now I try the same thing with nftlb and I get errors saying "Cannot > open disk drive". It should be the same process shouldn't it ? Any > ideas of where to look to fix or debug this ?? I've had a look at > nftldump and I can see the 3 sets of media headers and they seem like > they are in the right place. It should be the same process, yes -- although perhaps you might want a file system directly on each NFTL device, rather than partitioning them. Stick some debugging printks into the nftl_open routine to see why it fails. (Or just enable debugging so the existing ones happen.) -- dwmw2