linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions
@ 2011-01-10 21:27 David Lambert
  2011-01-11  8:56 ` Jon Povey
  2011-01-18  8:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Lambert @ 2011-01-10 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd

After upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 I noticed that the stock mkfs.ubifs 
(version 1.3) failed to compute checksums correctly. I compiled my own 
version from the git source of mtd-utils which announces itself as 
version 1.4; this worked fine. Being curious I logged onto a machine 
running Ubuntu 10.4 and checked the version of mkfs.ubifs and also found 
it to be 1.3, but this version computes checksums correctly! Is there a 
sub-version of mkfs.ubifs between 1.3 and 1.4 that is not shown by using 
--version? Am I missing something critical here?

Regards,

Dave.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions
  2011-01-10 21:27 Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions David Lambert
@ 2011-01-11  8:56 ` Jon Povey
  2011-01-18  8:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Povey @ 2011-01-11  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Lambert, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org

linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org wrote:
> After upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 I noticed that the stock mkfs.ubifs
> (version 1.3) failed to compute checksums correctly. I compiled my own
> version from the git source of mtd-utils which announces itself as
> version 1.4; this worked fine. Being curious I logged onto a machine
> running Ubuntu 10.4 and checked the version of mkfs.ubifs and
> also found
> it to be 1.3, but this version computes checksums correctly!
> Is there a
> sub-version of mkfs.ubifs between 1.3 and 1.4 that is not
> shown by using
> --version? Am I missing something critical here?

There was a time period a few months ago (not very specific, sorry)
when mkfs.ubifs checksums were indeed broken.

Unfortunate if the Ubuntu 10.10 stock version has that bug :/

Not tried it myself, though just put Ubuntu 10.10 on a machine here
and might be using it for dev so I'll bear that in mind. Thanks.

--
Jon Povey
jon.povey@racelogic.co.uk

Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number 2743719 .
Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, Bucks, MK18 1TB .

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected. The views expressed by the sender of this communication do not necessarily represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications passing through its network

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions
  2011-01-10 21:27 Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions David Lambert
  2011-01-11  8:56 ` Jon Povey
@ 2011-01-18  8:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2011-01-18  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Lambert; +Cc: linux-mtd

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:27 -0600, David Lambert wrote:
> After upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 I noticed that the stock mkfs.ubifs 
> (version 1.3) failed to compute checksums correctly. I compiled my own 
> version from the git source of mtd-utils which announces itself as 
> version 1.4; this worked fine. Being curious I logged onto a machine 
> running Ubuntu 10.4 and checked the version of mkfs.ubifs and also found 
> it to be 1.3, but this version computes checksums correctly! Is there a 
> sub-version of mkfs.ubifs between 1.3 and 1.4 that is not shown by using 
> --version? Am I missing something critical here?

Since mtd-utils are not managed very well, and we were not tagging them
regularly enough, I think Ubuntu guys just picked a non-tagged snapshot
which had that bug. Just take newer version please, or ask Ubunto folks
to do this.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-18  8:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-10 21:27 Confusion over mkfs.ubifs versions David Lambert
2011-01-11  8:56 ` Jon Povey
2011-01-18  8:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).