[PATCH 09/29] t7166xb: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers

Andres Salomon
2011-02-18T03:08:03Z

No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size.

Modify clients to use mfd_get_cell helper function instead of
accessing platform_data directly.

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
---
drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c | 9 ---------
drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c b/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
index 9caeb4a..b9c1e4c 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c
@@ -384,15 +384,6 @@ static int t7l66xb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
t7l66xb_attach_irq(dev);

t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].driver_data = pdata->nand_data;
- t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].platform_data =
- &t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND];
- t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND].data_size =
- sizeof(t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_NAND]);
-
- t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC].platform_data =
- &t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC];
- t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC].data_size =
- sizeof(t7l66xb_cells[T7L66XB_CELL_MMC]);

ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, dev->id,
t7l66xb_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(t7l66xb_cells),
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
index 3041d1f..5bf63e3 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/tmio_nand.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int tmio_nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned char *buf,

static int tmio_hw_init(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
{
- struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
int ret;

if (cell->enable) {
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int tmio_hw_init(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)

static void tmio_hw_stop(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)
{
- struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);

tmio_iowrite8(FCR_MODE_POWER_OFF, tmio->fcr + FCR_MODE);
if (cell->disable)
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void tmio_hw_stop(struct platform_device *dev, struct tmio_nand *tmio)

static int tmio_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
{
- struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);
struct tmio_nand_data *data = cell->driver_data;
struct resource *fcr = platform_get_resource(dev,
IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static int tmio_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int tmio_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
- struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);

if (cell->suspend)
cell->suspend(dev);
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int tmio_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)

static int tmio_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
{
- struct mfd_cell *cell = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(dev);

/* FIXME - is this required or merely another attack of the broken
* SHARP platform? Looks suspicious.
--
1.7.2.3