From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: OneNAND: OMAP2: increase multiblock erase verify timeout From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Tony Lindgren In-Reply-To: <20110217234603.GI20795@atomide.com> References: <1297068421-14430-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> <1297068421-14430-5-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> <20110217234603.GI20795@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:31:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1298003498.2735.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Kyungmin Park , linux-omap Mailing List , linux-mtd Mailing List , linux-arm Mailing List , Adrian Hunter Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:46 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Adrian Hunter [110207 00:45]: > > From: Roman Tereshonkov > > > > The current multiblock erase verify read timeout 100us is the maximum > > for none-error case. If errors happen during multibock erase then > > the specification recommends to run multiblock erase verify command > > with maximum timeout 10ms (see specs. for KFM4G16Q2A and KFN8G16Q2A). > > > > For the most common non-error case we wait 100us in udelay polling > > loop. In case of timeout the interrupt mode is used to wait for the > > command end. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roman Tereshonkov > > I'll queue this series. Anybody from MTD list care to ack this patch? Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)