From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PstXD-0002K5-5r for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:00:23 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1268675wwb.18 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:00:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: xattr question AGAIN! From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Steve Iribarne In-Reply-To: <4D5C200C.3010007@grid-net.com> References: <4D5C200C.3010007@grid-net.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1298624339.2798.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 11:05 -0800, Steve Iribarne wrote: > Sorry for the repeat but I just want to be sure I'm getting this right. > > So the UBIFS supports most of the SELinux xattrs. I believe the only > exception is ACL. > > Is this a correct assumption? Yes. However, we never tried selinux, so there may be some issues. We might forget to do some small thing. > And we are going to start doing some extensive testing on this, so I'll > report any issues we find. I also may have resources to add ACL support. Just try if selinux xattrs are supported or not and report back please. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)