From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PsvCd-0002q1-1c for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:47:15 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1518155wyf.36 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:47:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: mount ubi volume fails: No such device From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Lars Michael In-Reply-To: <664335.29092.qm@web30201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <664335.29092.qm@web30201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:45:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1298630702.2798.45.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 02:57 -0800, Lars Michael wrote: > NAND read: device 0 offset 0x1, size 0xfffffff > Skipping bad block 0x00000000 > Skipping bad block 0x00020000 > Skipping bad block 0x00040000 > > Skipping bad block 0x0ffa0000 > Skipping bad block 0x0ffc0000 > Skipping bad block 0x0ffe0000 > NAND read from offset 10000000 failed -22 > 0 bytes read: ERROR > -> nand > > I am really stuck here, and don't know how to proceed. Is it normal that > the flash can suddenly go totally bad? Most likely not. Probably this is due to a bug somewhere. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)