public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: David Peverley <pev@sketchymonkey.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>,
	Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@axis.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE with Software ECC
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:21:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298640109.2798.110.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikKe2ub8CZ+vP-1gXjtr=-BDJ6nc8aEG_9iJj6K@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 12:59 +0000, David Peverley wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> > How about changing the MTD interface a little and teach it to:
> > 1. Report the bit-flip level (or you name it properly) - the amount of
> > bits flipped in this NAND page (or sub-page). If we read more than one
> > NAND page at one go, and several pages had bit-flips of different level,
> > report the maximum.
> This is important to allow the file-system to make an informed
> decision based on what happened within MTD. i.e. it would be able to
> ascertain whether a read corrected N bit errors and thus be able to
> re-program a block as required. I think is the only way to accomplish
> handling this at the FS level? However, given that the count comes
> from a specific read operation, I think it would need to be
> implemented as part of the read call e.g. passing in something like
> "unsigned *bit_errors"? This would mean changing something fundamental
> or providing a new API to read with this extra parameter so I'm not
> sure how this could be accomplished 'nicely'...

I do not think it is an issue - changing in-kernel API is relatively
easy and straight-forward task.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 12:35 CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE with Software ECC David Peverley
2011-02-15 13:02 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-15 14:00   ` David Peverley
2011-02-15 15:01     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-15 17:58       ` David Peverley
2011-02-17 10:04         ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-25  8:42           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25  9:09             ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-25 10:29               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 11:36                 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 12:12                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 12:59                     ` David Peverley
2011-02-25 13:21                       ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-02-25 18:27                       ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 14:44                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 16:41                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 12:22                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 15:14                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25  8:31     ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298640109.2798.110.camel@localhost \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pev@sketchymonkey.com \
    --cc=ricard.wanderlof@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox