From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PxItU-0003hE-5O for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:53:36 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so136385ewy.36 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:53:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Perf issue with UBIFS From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Bhavesh Parekh In-Reply-To: <1299587464.2754.27.camel@localhost> References: <1299587464.2754.27.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:51:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1299675114.2741.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 14:31 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > But please, try UBIFS bulk_read option, does it make any difference for > you? Ah, and of course, use the 'no_chk_data_crc' option to have more fair comparison! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)