From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q5GkL-00020L-8X for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:13:05 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1925356wwb.18 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Perf issue with UBIFS From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Bhavesh Parekh In-Reply-To: References: <1299587464.2754.27.camel@localhost> <1299764095.6676.22.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:10:44 +0300 Message-ID: <1301573444.2828.52.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:14 +0530, Bhavesh Parekh wrote: > Thanks Artem. > Patches you mention helped alot. Now the perf is almost same as that > of YAFFS2. > > I think there will be changes require in the root-fs creation > tool(ubinize) as well to support the writebufsize. Correct ? No, I do not think so. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)