From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([147.243.128.26] helo=mgw-da02.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q5au8-0007jm-MJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:44:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Vipin Kumar In-Reply-To: <4D9595AB.1050604@st.com> References: <1301579475.2828.82.camel@localhost> <4D95708A.7080204@st.com> <1301640710.2789.11.camel@localhost> <4D958DC2.5000607@st.com> <1301647180.2789.35.camel@localhost> <4D9595AB.1050604@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:42:06 +0300 Message-ID: <1301650926.2789.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Viresh KUMAR , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "David.Woodhouse@intel.com" Reply-To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 14:36 +0530, Vipin Kumar wrote: > Yes, I understand the issue and would write more details about it in the > patch comment. Moreover, the comparison id only expensive when the page > contains all FFs.. Most of the time comparison would fail at first few bytes OK, actually yes, probably this ECC check is not needed. Anyway, will you send the updated patch please? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)