From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q5foD-0002d1-Hu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:58:46 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so2999187wwb.18 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] do not select KALLSYMS_ALL From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Paulo Marques In-Reply-To: <4D948D52.4040708@grupopie.com> References: <1301474416-8202-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <4D948D52.4040708@grupopie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:56:16 +0300 Message-ID: <1301669776.2789.92.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , MTD list , lkml Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:18 +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > [...] > > I personally think KALLSYMS_ALL should be just merged with KALLSYMS and > > disappear - we should have only one option. CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS should > > die as well. > > That sounds a little too extreme... > > KALLSYMS is useful for most kernels, since it provides nice readable > stack dumps for panics and BUG's. > > KALLSYMS_ALL adds a lot of extra symbols that can be useful mostly to > development kernels and shouldn't be used to add unnecessary bloat to > user kernels. Well, ok, I've measured how much is this "a lot". On an embedded arm platform this makes the kernel only 1.5% larger. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)