From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q5ftV-0002nA-75 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:04:13 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so1194879ewy.36 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] do not select KALLSYMS_ALL From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Paulo Marques In-Reply-To: <1301669776.2789.92.camel@localhost> References: <1301474416-8202-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <4D948D52.4040708@grupopie.com> <1301669776.2789.92.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:01:44 +0300 Message-ID: <1301670104.2789.94.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , MTD list , lkml Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 17:56 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Well, ok, I've measured how much is this "a lot". On an embedded arm > platform this makes the kernel only 1.5% larger. But in absolute numbers this is 70KiB in my case, which is indeed considerable amount. So, I agree that it makes sense to keep this as a separate option. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)