From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q6eiD-0008Np-9A for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:00:37 +0000 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14so4701339fxm.36 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 01:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: renumber conflicting BBT flags From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Brian Norris In-Reply-To: <1300510422-4841-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> References: <1300510422-4841-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:58:05 +0300 Message-ID: <1301903885.2760.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Woodhouse , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Kevin Cernekee , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:53 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > The NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT_NO_OOB and NAND_CREATE_EMPTY_BBT flags conflict > with the NAND_BBT_SCANBYTE1AND6 and NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT flags, > respectively. This change will allow us to utilize these options > independently. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris I've pushed both patches to l2-mtd-2.6.git, thanks. P.S. Hopefully you won't be discouraged from doing further flags polishing :-). -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)