From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q6gii-0000pe-Jb for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:09:17 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so4591411wwb.18 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Use empty_iops and empty_fops consistently From: Artem Bityutskiy To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <1301874939-2630-1-git-send-email-sedat.dilek@gmail.com> <1301900656.2760.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:06:44 +0300 Message-ID: <1301911604.2760.52.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:38 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Sorry for having flooded your inbox. That's ok! :-) I think I did not look carefully enough. Your patch is just an additional clean-up which makes the names to be consistent. I can pick it, but probably it is better if it goes in with the 'empty_aops' changes? Whatever you prefer. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)