From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Q6l86-0003aO-GQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:51:50 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so4804963wwb.18 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] UBIFS: fix failure in dbg_check_space_info From: Artem Bityutskiy To: MTD list In-Reply-To: <1301928297-2246-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> References: <1301928297-2246-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:49:13 +0300 Message-ID: <1301928553.2760.95.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Caizhiyong Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 17:44 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > This patch has to fix the failure in 'dbg_check_space_info()' which > I can reproduce myself with the 'integck' test and which has also been > reported here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/034647.html > > The fix is in the last patch and it is quite trivial. It also describes > the reason for the failure. > > Patches 1-4 mostly improve the debugging output which helps to diagnose > the problem quicker. So they are preparational patches. Actually, I think this is bad arrangement. I'll re-arrange patches so that the first patch is the fix, and then the debugging output improvements. So you can pick only the fix, and I'll also send it to -stable. I'll send you the fix shortly. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)