From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QBoek-0003Mb-Bn for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:38:22 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so1554141ewy.36 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: UBI partitioning in embedded device? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ricard Wanderlof In-Reply-To: References: <0A40042D85E7C84DB443060EC44B3FD32A6941578B@dekaexchange07.deka.local> <1303131675.8589.7.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:35:26 +0300 Message-ID: <1303133726.8589.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Linux mtd , Atlant Schmidt Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 15:33 +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > I think what I'm most worried about is some bug in UBI causing the > critical data to be lost at some point. And as you said, some form of > backup would definitely help. Well, good testing and redundancy would be the answer... -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)