From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QDBY3-0007mD-4S for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:17:07 +0000 Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so140324eyh.36 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bbt and bitflip From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Matthieu CASTET In-Reply-To: <4DB06693.5000100@parrot.com> References: <4DB033E4.6030105@parrot.com> <4DB06693.5000100@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:14:09 +0300 Message-ID: <1303460049.2757.47.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:17 +0200, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > } > + if (res != -EUCLEAN) { > + printk(KERN_INFO "nand_bbt: Error reading bad block table2\n"); > + return res; > + } Just a side note: I tend to think that we need to veto all mtd patches which touch/add prints and force people to first turn all the ugly MTD printing mess into dev_dbg/dev_err/etc messages... But I cannot actually propose it before I clean up UBI/UBIFS in this respect :-))) -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)